Eugene Volokh does a quick recap:
Contact Dale Carpenter David Kopel David Bernstein David Hyman David Post Eric Posner Eugene Volokh
Tom Jensen thinks about it:
Our Final Calls As we release our final polls for various offices across North Carolina and the country over the final week of the campaign, we'll post the final toplines all in one place here:
Aaron Wilson gives a bit of an idea about it:
Send Scoop Give Us Feedback PFT Mobile Login / Register Layout: Font Size: A A A 09 Delaware Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Sports Betting Lottery
Kitten brings a word of caution:
The one advantage Sotomayor's talk-to-the-hand opinion has over Justice Ginsburg's prolix dissent is that brevity prevented Sotomayor from having to explain why quotas aren't quotas.
David Bernstein comes with the facts:
, helpful in better understanding some of the shenanigans that those two rogue justices managed to pull off together.
tmess2 intervenes and adds:
The Voting Rights Act uses political subdivision in many places. For one provision (Section 14), there is a definition that essentially limits the term to those political subdivisions that actually maintain voter registaration records. The lower court essentially held that this narrow definition also applied to Section 4 which would mean that only states and counties/parishes (in some states townships) could apply to be found to have become non-discriminatory. Thus smaller political subdivisions (like cities, school districts, etc.) could only escape from pre-clearance if their state or county successfully applied for a finding that they had emerged from pre-clearance.
Paul Edward Parker thinks that the problem is:
CORRECTION: The earlier version of this story incorrectly said the state Supreme Court indicated it was unlikely the issue of public access to juror questionnaires will arise again.
While it may be true, jtertullian|jtcontracelsum.blogspot.com thinks:
Obama and Sotomayor are profoundly anti-Christian and anti-God in these matters. Go to Source
Sanjeeb Baruah thinks about it:
Related NewsMadhya Pradesh's missing tigers: Probe panel to begin work Thursday June 30th, 2009 BHOPAL - A panel set up by the Madhya Pradesh government to probe how tigers have disappeared from the Panna Tiger Reserve will begin its work Thursday, officials said. The central government had earlier criticised the state government for failing to pay heed to the warnings about the tigers' disappearance from Panna.
Before going any further, Lyle Denniston wants to get this straight:
James M. Maloney s petition in Maloney v. Rice is the third case on that point to reach the Court in recent weeks. This one, however, seeks to challenge a ruling that has gained a special prominence because one of the judges on the Second Circuit Court panel deciding against Maloney s claim was Circuit Judge Sonia Sotomayor, President Obama s choice for a soon-to-be-open Supreme Court vacancy.
matthew archbold comes with the facts:
June 2, 2009 10:23 PM MissJean said... Years ago, I read an interesting article about the reason that there ARE so many Jews and Catholics judges. One thing I recall is that these religions have a long history of reading and discussing The Law, researching "precedent", and determining how God s Law applies to seemingly new ethical dilemnas.
Andy Worthington considers that:
Moving on, the Justice Department entered a previously uncharted realm of callousness when its brief dismissed the reasons that the Uighurs cannot be returned to China â€" because of international treaties preventing the return of foreign nationals to countries where they face the risk of torture â€" by pretending that it was their own choice. The Uighurs, the government stated, "would like the federal courts to order that they be brought to the United States, because they are unwilling to return to their home country [emphasis added]. But they have no entitlement to that form of relief."
Administrator is rather skeptical:
Adewale from Britain 12 June 2009 (3 weeks ago) 17:27 Always be hopeful for better days are coming without any hiderance! TO GOD BE GLORY.
Debra L. Ness brings a word of caution:
Billy Mays Dead At 50 TAMPA, Fla. Billy Mays, the burly, bearded television pitchman whose boisterous hawking of products such as...
Still being unsure, DORIAN DE WIND asks:
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice/Joe Gandelman | Designed by Elegant Themes | Customized by Tyrone Steels II/ Enxit Group, LLC
Thinking that's not all, Jay Sorgi. UNDATED - The adds:
Radar 7 Day Forecast Live Weather Video Weather 63 ° Cloudy Wind : NW 8 mph Humidity : 63 Wed, Jul 1, 2009 More Weather
Chief Editor also takes into account the following fact:
12 . Mwisho says: June 19, 2009 at 9:25 am Imwe vima SC siyani kushushana please muzatisebanya, to which school did you train your professional from? Awe chamusebanya sana. And where is Ernest Sakala?
Sources:
Eugene Volokh Tom Jensen Aaron Wilson Kitten David Bernstein tmess2 Paul Edward Parker jtertullian|jtcontracelsum.blogspot.com Sanjeeb Baruah Lyle Denniston matthew archbold Andy Worthington Administrator Debra L. Ness DORIAN DE WIND Jay Sorgi. UNDATED - The Chief Editor
Disclaimer:
This text is automatically generated from different sources on the internet. It must be considered an experiment
Saturday, August 15, 2009
Supreme Court From: Eugene Volokh Tom Jensen Aaron Wilson Kitten David Bernstein Tmess2 Paul Edward Parker Jtertullian|jtcontracelsum.blogspot.com Sanjeeb Baruah Lyle Denniston Matthew Archbold Andy Worthington Administrator Debra L. Ness DORIAN DE WIND Jay Sorgi. UNDATED - The Chief Editor /26709880
Supreme Court From: Bureau News Pakalert Dmartink Pmatthews Lexington Green Kitten David Bernstein Matt Nan Hunter Danielle Belton Lincoln Mitchell Editor Confidential Reporter Joan Garry Pat Dollard Js609163 Julie Hirschfeld Davis, The Associated Press Eric Kleefeld The Huffington Post News Editors /26709885
Furthermore, Bureau News claims:
Black can still ask a federal trial judge for bail. The judge who presided over the trial has already said one of the men, John Boultbee, can be released on bond.
pakalert objects:
Homeland Security and U.S. Army Plan Invasion of States The CIA’s Swine Flu & Your Plastic FEMA Coffin
dmartink does not seem to agree with this. In his own words:
Structure & Strangeness Tax Prof Blog The Big Picture The Conglomerate The Monkey Cage Voir Dire
pmatthews points out another thing aside from that:
 The appellate court rejected the patent because it is too abstract. The claims are not tied to any particular form of technology, thus they do not require a computer or particular storage media.
Lexington Green points out another thing aside from that:
Meryl Yourish Michael Barone (Beltway Confidential) Michael Fumento Michael J. Totten Michael Ledeen Michael Yon Midas Oracle
Kitten is absolutely sure that:
I note that Ginsburg has not shown any particular interest in rectifying the "disparate impact" of legal exams: She never hired a single black law clerk out of the dozens she employed in more than a decade as an appeals court judge. (Her hiring practices on the Supreme Court are a state secret, but I can state with supreme certainty that her clerks do not reflect the racial mix of Washington, D.C.)
David Bernstein brings more details:
I've been working on chapter 4 of my book-in-progress, Rehabilitating Lochner. This chapter deals with protective labor laws for women, and liberty of contract challenges to such laws. In 1923, the Supreme Court invalidated a minimum wage for women in a 5-4 vote (Adkins v. Children's Hospital), but a year later the Court unanimously upheld a ban on night work by women (Radice v. New York).
Matt brings more details:
Thanks for the clarification ( 0.00 / 0 ) Could you explain why that is? Is is just stays that go directly to the US Supreme Court? This is actually good for Franken. Yes, US Supreme could issue a stay, but it's only one court, and if they don't, this thing could finally be over. by: Matt @ Tue Jun 30, 2009 at 00:00:03 AM CDT [ Parent ]
Still being unsure, Nan Hunter asks:
Posted by Nan Hunter on June 25, 2009 at 12:00 AM in Reproductive rights , Supreme Court | Permalink TrackBack TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e553bc36a3883401157155ae56970b Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Fourth Circuit abortion case in pipeline to Supreme Court :
In response, Danielle Belton claims:
I'm much less surprised at Uncle Thomas than I am by Roberts and Scalia, especially Roberts. In rulings on school desegration and employment discrimination, as well as rendering his opinion when Congress renewed the VRA, Roberts has made it clear he regards racism and discrimination pretty much as vestiges of the past, and that there is no legal basis to rectify the impact of past discrimination. I was expecting a 5-4 ruling with the conservative majority finding Section 5 unconstitutional. Dare I hold out hope that cool and thoughtful heads will prevail on the Ricci case as well? June 22, 2009 | Winn
Lincoln Mitchell objects:
Anthony D. Romero: The Best of Days, the Worst of Days As one glass ceiling was being shattered and as America was overcoming centuries of discrimination against women and Latinos, one other ceiling was being reinforced over the heads of gay and lesbian couples in California.
While it may be true, editor thinks:
 Sarabjit s conviction was upheld by a three-member Supreme Court bench led by Justice Raja Fayyaz Ahmed. Sarabjit was sentenced to death by a special court, a decision which was retained by the High Court. Later, the Supreme Court rejected the petition filed against the sentence.
Confidential Reporter thinks that the problem is:
China Confidential: 9/11 Families Charge Obama Administration with Allowing Top Saudi Royals to Escape Accountability .comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}
Joan Garry gives a bit of an idea about it:
See K.J. Dwyer's Profile With regards to the state, marriage is, first and last, a civil contract. The proof of this is that when one seeks to dissolve a marriage, they don't go to their priest, minister or rabbi to get a divorce; they go to court.
However, Pat Dollard states that:
Scully added: “But you sell a lot of magazines.â€Obama parried: “Well, you know, Michelle sells a lot of magazines. I don t about how magazines with me on the cover do. I think Michelle s do very well.â€
Meanwhile, js609163 came up with this idea:
The identity leak led to an obstruction of justice conviction for onetime Cheney chief of staff Lewis "Scooter" Libby. A jury found he lied to investigators about his role in the Plame matter. No charges were ever brought against anyone for actually leaking Plame's identity.
In contrast, Julie Hirschfeld Davis, The Associated Press replies:
Sessions acknowledged as much Wednesday, saying the GOP needs to "broaden its tent."But at the same time he said he feels lawmakers have "an absolute constitutional duty" to ensure that any nominee elevated to the high court not be someone who would bring along a personal agenda.
Eric Kleefeld imagines that:
BTW I'm confused about procedure myself, as noted below. So let's ask the cognoscenti.I am more arguing here that he wants *everybody* to understand what his next moves are, and what they need to do to influence same. The court *must* order him to sign or he's not going to, and he hopes they do so he's got fewer options. He's in more political jeopardy if they let him use his own (partistan 2012 USA-tuning-into-Latin-America-in-70s) judgement. So since he's now told them, hopefully they got the message and will do so. He's left himself some wiggle room to see what Coleman then does, but he may even have misspoke -- I just laid out the implications of what he actually *said.* I think he'd love to have his hand forced to deny himself any options and then he can campaign against those devils who will have so crudely forced his hand, when the fiends should be *interpreting* the law, not legislating from the bench! Blah-blah-blah.
The Huffington Post News Editors imagines that:
First Posted: 05-26-09 08:09 PM | Updated: 05-26-09 08:56 PM I Like It I Don t Like It
Sources:
Bureau News pakalert dmartink pmatthews Lexington Green Kitten David Bernstein Matt Nan Hunter Danielle Belton Lincoln Mitchell editor Confidential Reporter Joan Garry Pat Dollard js609163 Julie Hirschfeld Davis, The Associated Press Eric Kleefeld The Huffington Post News Editors
Disclaimer:
This text is automatically generated from different sources on the internet. It must be considered an experiment
Black can still ask a federal trial judge for bail. The judge who presided over the trial has already said one of the men, John Boultbee, can be released on bond.
pakalert objects:
Homeland Security and U.S. Army Plan Invasion of States The CIA’s Swine Flu & Your Plastic FEMA Coffin
dmartink does not seem to agree with this. In his own words:
Structure & Strangeness Tax Prof Blog The Big Picture The Conglomerate The Monkey Cage Voir Dire
pmatthews points out another thing aside from that:
 The appellate court rejected the patent because it is too abstract. The claims are not tied to any particular form of technology, thus they do not require a computer or particular storage media.
Lexington Green points out another thing aside from that:
Meryl Yourish Michael Barone (Beltway Confidential) Michael Fumento Michael J. Totten Michael Ledeen Michael Yon Midas Oracle
Kitten is absolutely sure that:
I note that Ginsburg has not shown any particular interest in rectifying the "disparate impact" of legal exams: She never hired a single black law clerk out of the dozens she employed in more than a decade as an appeals court judge. (Her hiring practices on the Supreme Court are a state secret, but I can state with supreme certainty that her clerks do not reflect the racial mix of Washington, D.C.)
David Bernstein brings more details:
I've been working on chapter 4 of my book-in-progress, Rehabilitating Lochner. This chapter deals with protective labor laws for women, and liberty of contract challenges to such laws. In 1923, the Supreme Court invalidated a minimum wage for women in a 5-4 vote (Adkins v. Children's Hospital), but a year later the Court unanimously upheld a ban on night work by women (Radice v. New York).
Matt brings more details:
Thanks for the clarification ( 0.00 / 0 ) Could you explain why that is? Is is just stays that go directly to the US Supreme Court? This is actually good for Franken. Yes, US Supreme could issue a stay, but it's only one court, and if they don't, this thing could finally be over. by: Matt @ Tue Jun 30, 2009 at 00:00:03 AM CDT [ Parent ]
Still being unsure, Nan Hunter asks:
Posted by Nan Hunter on June 25, 2009 at 12:00 AM in Reproductive rights , Supreme Court | Permalink TrackBack TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e553bc36a3883401157155ae56970b Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Fourth Circuit abortion case in pipeline to Supreme Court :
In response, Danielle Belton claims:
I'm much less surprised at Uncle Thomas than I am by Roberts and Scalia, especially Roberts. In rulings on school desegration and employment discrimination, as well as rendering his opinion when Congress renewed the VRA, Roberts has made it clear he regards racism and discrimination pretty much as vestiges of the past, and that there is no legal basis to rectify the impact of past discrimination. I was expecting a 5-4 ruling with the conservative majority finding Section 5 unconstitutional. Dare I hold out hope that cool and thoughtful heads will prevail on the Ricci case as well? June 22, 2009 | Winn
Lincoln Mitchell objects:
Anthony D. Romero: The Best of Days, the Worst of Days As one glass ceiling was being shattered and as America was overcoming centuries of discrimination against women and Latinos, one other ceiling was being reinforced over the heads of gay and lesbian couples in California.
While it may be true, editor thinks:
 Sarabjit s conviction was upheld by a three-member Supreme Court bench led by Justice Raja Fayyaz Ahmed. Sarabjit was sentenced to death by a special court, a decision which was retained by the High Court. Later, the Supreme Court rejected the petition filed against the sentence.
Confidential Reporter thinks that the problem is:
China Confidential: 9/11 Families Charge Obama Administration with Allowing Top Saudi Royals to Escape Accountability .comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}
Joan Garry gives a bit of an idea about it:
See K.J. Dwyer's Profile With regards to the state, marriage is, first and last, a civil contract. The proof of this is that when one seeks to dissolve a marriage, they don't go to their priest, minister or rabbi to get a divorce; they go to court.
However, Pat Dollard states that:
Scully added: “But you sell a lot of magazines.â€Obama parried: “Well, you know, Michelle sells a lot of magazines. I don t about how magazines with me on the cover do. I think Michelle s do very well.â€
Meanwhile, js609163 came up with this idea:
The identity leak led to an obstruction of justice conviction for onetime Cheney chief of staff Lewis "Scooter" Libby. A jury found he lied to investigators about his role in the Plame matter. No charges were ever brought against anyone for actually leaking Plame's identity.
In contrast, Julie Hirschfeld Davis, The Associated Press replies:
Sessions acknowledged as much Wednesday, saying the GOP needs to "broaden its tent."But at the same time he said he feels lawmakers have "an absolute constitutional duty" to ensure that any nominee elevated to the high court not be someone who would bring along a personal agenda.
Eric Kleefeld imagines that:
BTW I'm confused about procedure myself, as noted below. So let's ask the cognoscenti.I am more arguing here that he wants *everybody* to understand what his next moves are, and what they need to do to influence same. The court *must* order him to sign or he's not going to, and he hopes they do so he's got fewer options. He's in more political jeopardy if they let him use his own (partistan 2012 USA-tuning-into-Latin-America-in-70s) judgement. So since he's now told them, hopefully they got the message and will do so. He's left himself some wiggle room to see what Coleman then does, but he may even have misspoke -- I just laid out the implications of what he actually *said.* I think he'd love to have his hand forced to deny himself any options and then he can campaign against those devils who will have so crudely forced his hand, when the fiends should be *interpreting* the law, not legislating from the bench! Blah-blah-blah.
The Huffington Post News Editors imagines that:
First Posted: 05-26-09 08:09 PM | Updated: 05-26-09 08:56 PM I Like It I Don t Like It
Sources:
Bureau News pakalert dmartink pmatthews Lexington Green Kitten David Bernstein Matt Nan Hunter Danielle Belton Lincoln Mitchell editor Confidential Reporter Joan Garry Pat Dollard js609163 Julie Hirschfeld Davis, The Associated Press Eric Kleefeld The Huffington Post News Editors
Disclaimer:
This text is automatically generated from different sources on the internet. It must be considered an experiment
Supreme Court From: Allan Simon Fodden Jenia Turner The Caucus Monique Chartier Mary Grabar The Huffington Post News Team Tom Smith Ben Sheffner Administrator Sanjeeb Baruah Lexington Green Michael Barone The GTL™ Ashby Jones Tomcollins Lincoln Mitchell Ciciliano And Associates, LLC /26709884
For this reason, allan says:
The majority relied on principles such as federalism, comity, finality and states rights, to reject the broad-based due process right of access to evidence for testing purposes advocated by Justice Stevens four-member minority.
For this reason, Simon Fodden says:
Name (required) Mail (will not be published) (required) Website
Jenia Turner is rather skeptical:
As the Supreme Court s term has just ended, I could not help but comment briefly on some of the Court s pronouncements on criminal procedure. Because of my interest in comparative criminal procedure, I was curious to observe how in several recent opinions (
But The Caucus has a different opinion:
Late this afternoon, Mr. Franken emerged from his home with his wife at his side, promising to get to work as soon as possible in the Senate. Working with our fantastic senior Senator, Amy Klobuchar, I m going to fight hard to put people to work, improve education, make Minnesota the epicenter of a new renewable energy economy, and make quality health care accessible and affordable for all Minnesotans.
Similarly, Monique Chartier adds:
Transform RIRI Republican AssemblyRI Statewide CoalitionRI Ethics CommissionOperation Clean GovernmentCommon Cause of RIRIPolicyAnalysisRI Kids Count
In response, Mary Grabar claims:
Jun 2, 2009 - 10:52 am 24. David Thomson: The fact is that even to get a degree in the sciences or engineering, one has to take humanities and social science classes.
But The Huffington Post News Team says that's not all:
File - Indiana Pension Fund attorney Tom Lauria exits Manhattan federal court, in this Friday, June 5, 2009 file photo taken in New York. Three Indiana state pension and construction funds filed emergency papers at the high court early Sunday June 7, 2009 to put the sale on hold so they can pursue an appeal. Chief Judge Dennis Jacobs of the New York-based appeals court asked Thomas Lauria, the lawyer representing the Indiana funds, why he believed his clients would be better off if the deal with Fiat went away and Chrysler was forced to liquidate. (AP Photo/ Louis Lanzano, File) Share Print Comments
Tom Smith can't forget that:
Ben Sheffner brings a word of caution:
Best Request for Admission of All Time Professor Nesson s recording: What we know RIAA blog: Thomas-Rasset jury like a focus group o...
For this purpose, Administrator suggests:
Adebanny 12 June 2009 (3 weeks ago) 17:15 They say justice delayed is justice denied, this has proved them wrong. victory at last
Sanjeeb Baruah does not seem to agree with this. In his own words:
The only solution left is to create different populations in different areas. The geographical barriers might help the lions evolve stronger genes in the near future that would ensure their long-term survival, he explains.
For example, Lexington Green considers:
Adloyada Agoraphilia Alan Macfarlane Alan Macfarlane E-Books Alan Macfarlane YouTube Albion s Seedlings All That Is Necessary
Furthermore, Michael Barone claims:
News & Election Videos SEND TO A FRIEND | PRINT | | Share June 4, 2009Advancing Civil Rights by Overturning Old Laws
Meanwhile, The GTL™ came up with this idea:
decided (The New York Times). The highest scoring minority firefighters, passed over, took exception and took New Haven to court over it while President Barack Hussein Obama s top (so-called) liberal SCOTUS nominee, the latina justice Sonia Sotomayor ruled in favor of the township and against the discriminated, citing precedent in her opinion, as she should have. The discriminated victims disagreed and took their fight to the Supreme Court of The United States in desparation. The SCOTUS found in favor of the discriminated men, thus overturning Sotomayor s decision. Strangely, the majority who ruled in favor of the discriminated minority of firemen were the (so-called) conservative justices while the dissenting justices who ruled against them were the so-called liberal justices. Every bit as stunning as the reversal of ideological makeup of the Kelo Decision s majority.
Ashby Jones objects:
If you are saying that if it were not for amendments the Constitution would not change you are correct. Does that mean the Constitution is bad? It is because the possibility always exists to amend the Constitution through due process that the Constitution is good.
However, tomcollins states that:
Tom: Yes, Mr. President, it certainly did. Ahmadinejad: Right - and now tell me the truth, wasn’t your Supreme Court packed with judges who agreed with Bush politically?
Lincoln Mitchell might have an idea about it:
- + JustMyWords I'm a Fan of JustMyWords I'm a fan of this user permalink Well, technically, the blindfold on the system of justice is the ideal, but the fact that the image meets the ideal doesn't mean that actual PEOPLE meet the ideal.
Still being unsure, Ciciliano and Associates, LLC asks:
September (4) NEVADA SUPREME COURT MAKES UNPUBLISHED DECISIONS A... NEVADA SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES PROCEDURES USED FOR... PROFILE FOR JUDICIAL CANDIDATE GAYLE NATHAN ROBERT TEUTON APPOINTED TO FAMILY COURT
Ben Sheffner shows how it is done:
really, really wants them webcast. So much so that today he asked the Supreme Court to step in and declare that not allowing the webcast would violate his and the public's rights under the First and Fifth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution:
Sources:
allan Simon Fodden Jenia Turner The Caucus Monique Chartier Mary Grabar The Huffington Post News Team Tom Smith Ben Sheffner Administrator Sanjeeb Baruah Lexington Green Michael Barone The GTL™ Ashby Jones tomcollins Lincoln Mitchell Ciciliano and Associates, LLC
Disclaimer:
This text is automatically generated from different sources on the internet. It must be considered an experiment
The majority relied on principles such as federalism, comity, finality and states rights, to reject the broad-based due process right of access to evidence for testing purposes advocated by Justice Stevens four-member minority.
For this reason, Simon Fodden says:
Name (required) Mail (will not be published) (required) Website
Jenia Turner is rather skeptical:
As the Supreme Court s term has just ended, I could not help but comment briefly on some of the Court s pronouncements on criminal procedure. Because of my interest in comparative criminal procedure, I was curious to observe how in several recent opinions (
But The Caucus has a different opinion:
Late this afternoon, Mr. Franken emerged from his home with his wife at his side, promising to get to work as soon as possible in the Senate. Working with our fantastic senior Senator, Amy Klobuchar, I m going to fight hard to put people to work, improve education, make Minnesota the epicenter of a new renewable energy economy, and make quality health care accessible and affordable for all Minnesotans.
Similarly, Monique Chartier adds:
Transform RIRI Republican AssemblyRI Statewide CoalitionRI Ethics CommissionOperation Clean GovernmentCommon Cause of RIRIPolicyAnalysisRI Kids Count
In response, Mary Grabar claims:
Jun 2, 2009 - 10:52 am 24. David Thomson: The fact is that even to get a degree in the sciences or engineering, one has to take humanities and social science classes.
But The Huffington Post News Team says that's not all:
File - Indiana Pension Fund attorney Tom Lauria exits Manhattan federal court, in this Friday, June 5, 2009 file photo taken in New York. Three Indiana state pension and construction funds filed emergency papers at the high court early Sunday June 7, 2009 to put the sale on hold so they can pursue an appeal. Chief Judge Dennis Jacobs of the New York-based appeals court asked Thomas Lauria, the lawyer representing the Indiana funds, why he believed his clients would be better off if the deal with Fiat went away and Chrysler was forced to liquidate. (AP Photo/ Louis Lanzano, File) Share Print Comments
Tom Smith can't forget that:
Ben Sheffner brings a word of caution:
Best Request for Admission of All Time Professor Nesson s recording: What we know RIAA blog: Thomas-Rasset jury like a focus group o...
For this purpose, Administrator suggests:
Adebanny 12 June 2009 (3 weeks ago) 17:15 They say justice delayed is justice denied, this has proved them wrong. victory at last
Sanjeeb Baruah does not seem to agree with this. In his own words:
The only solution left is to create different populations in different areas. The geographical barriers might help the lions evolve stronger genes in the near future that would ensure their long-term survival, he explains.
For example, Lexington Green considers:
Adloyada Agoraphilia Alan Macfarlane Alan Macfarlane E-Books Alan Macfarlane YouTube Albion s Seedlings All That Is Necessary
Furthermore, Michael Barone claims:
News & Election Videos SEND TO A FRIEND | PRINT | | Share June 4, 2009Advancing Civil Rights by Overturning Old Laws
Meanwhile, The GTL™ came up with this idea:
decided (The New York Times). The highest scoring minority firefighters, passed over, took exception and took New Haven to court over it while President Barack Hussein Obama s top (so-called) liberal SCOTUS nominee, the latina justice Sonia Sotomayor ruled in favor of the township and against the discriminated, citing precedent in her opinion, as she should have. The discriminated victims disagreed and took their fight to the Supreme Court of The United States in desparation. The SCOTUS found in favor of the discriminated men, thus overturning Sotomayor s decision. Strangely, the majority who ruled in favor of the discriminated minority of firemen were the (so-called) conservative justices while the dissenting justices who ruled against them were the so-called liberal justices. Every bit as stunning as the reversal of ideological makeup of the Kelo Decision s majority.
Ashby Jones objects:
If you are saying that if it were not for amendments the Constitution would not change you are correct. Does that mean the Constitution is bad? It is because the possibility always exists to amend the Constitution through due process that the Constitution is good.
However, tomcollins states that:
Tom: Yes, Mr. President, it certainly did. Ahmadinejad: Right - and now tell me the truth, wasn’t your Supreme Court packed with judges who agreed with Bush politically?
Lincoln Mitchell might have an idea about it:
- + JustMyWords I'm a Fan of JustMyWords I'm a fan of this user permalink Well, technically, the blindfold on the system of justice is the ideal, but the fact that the image meets the ideal doesn't mean that actual PEOPLE meet the ideal.
Still being unsure, Ciciliano and Associates, LLC asks:
September (4) NEVADA SUPREME COURT MAKES UNPUBLISHED DECISIONS A... NEVADA SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES PROCEDURES USED FOR... PROFILE FOR JUDICIAL CANDIDATE GAYLE NATHAN ROBERT TEUTON APPOINTED TO FAMILY COURT
Ben Sheffner shows how it is done:
really, really wants them webcast. So much so that today he asked the Supreme Court to step in and declare that not allowing the webcast would violate his and the public's rights under the First and Fifth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution:
Sources:
allan Simon Fodden Jenia Turner The Caucus Monique Chartier Mary Grabar The Huffington Post News Team Tom Smith Ben Sheffner Administrator Sanjeeb Baruah Lexington Green Michael Barone The GTL™ Ashby Jones tomcollins Lincoln Mitchell Ciciliano and Associates, LLC
Disclaimer:
This text is automatically generated from different sources on the internet. It must be considered an experiment
Supreme Court From: Stogie Henry C. Jackson Paul Hogarth Aaron Wilson Ashby Jones Evan Harris Azuakanwa MURPHY Carie Chief Editor Steve Sailer Epaminondas Eugene Volokh DougJ Shikha.dalmia@reason.org (Shikha Dalmia) Roy Edroso /26709883
Stogie comes with a new idea:
Always On Watch: Semper Vigilans Musical Interlude National Review Online Steyn: Behind the Times Moe Lane July 4, 2009.
Henry C. Jackson does a quick recap:
Minn. Supreme Court paves way for Democrat Al Franken to fill long-vacant Senate seat June 30th, 2009 Minn. court rules for Franken in Senate fightST. PAUL, Minn. â€" The Minnesota Supreme Court on Tuesday ordered that Democrat Al Franken be certified as the winner of the state's long-running Senate race.
In response, Paul Hogarth claims:
But Property Rights are Protected ... If there is one bright spot from today's Court decision, the 18,000 same-sex couples who wed before November 4th are still legally married - despite efforts by Kenneth Starr to convince the Court otherwise. California law presumes that ballot measures are not retroactive, without clear and unambiguous proof that it was the voters' intent. But the Court also pointed out that these couples had acquired "vested property rights as lawfully married spouses," and to suddenly take their licenses away would be a blatant violation of due process.
For this reason, Aaron Wilson says:
Permalink | Comments | Latest stories in: Latest News and Rumors , Top Stories Previous: Jimmy Smith Pleads Not Guilty Next: Panthers Owner Returns To Practice Months After Heart Transplant
Ashby Jones brings a word of caution:
« Previous Embattled Stanford Indicted, Surrenders Next » Pair Crows over Botched Chicken Giveaway, Sues KFC Law Blog HOME PAGE
Evan Harris also takes into account the following fact:
« Previous | Main | Next » The Nomination Battle ContinuesMay 30, 2009 8:37 PMWatch my report on where things stand with Sotomayor’s nomination process. Some of her critics have accused her of racism, but others, including some Republicans, say that goes too far. The votes seem to be adding up in the Senate â€" especially as some Republicans fear angering women and Hispanics.
Thinking that's not all, azuakanwa adds:
Moment to Moment My Layman s View Onochie Anibeze Owei Lakemfa People & Politics Point of Order Positive Letters
As MURPHY says:
#9 | Posted by MURPHY at 2009-05-24 10:33 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose) Funny Newsworthy Offensive Abusive huger??? Wtf is that? It's the comparative form of the adjective 'huge'. 'Hugest' (in case you ever run into that word) is the superlative form.
Similarly, carie adds:
Botched Diaz execution prompts further study by commission Botched Execution -- Botched Protocol? Botched Execution Demands State Scrutiny Of Lethal Injection
For example, Chief Editor considers:
18 . KA'DOYO... says: June 19, 2009 at 9:51 am I seriously think RB eminine pa kupesha abena Zambia. Just wait and see
As Steve Sailer says:
But Judge Sotomayor insisted that her test scores were sub-par â€" “though not so far off the mark that I wasn’t able to succeed at those institutions.†Her scores have not been made public.
Epaminondas might have an idea about it:
We Stand With The Iranian People The Infidel Bloggers Alliance Radio Show Gathering Storm Report Radio Show
Eugene Volokh considers that:
( link ) Uh_Clem ( mail ): Obviously the court is unaware of the "drugs exception" to the constitution. /sarcasm 6.18.2009 4:59pm
In response, DougJ claims:
3 June 24th, 2009 at 11:45 pm Comrade Stuck Robert Bork is really a bit of whack job. My general impression of them is quite good. The justice up there who I most admire is Clarence Thomas. I notice that when he and Scalia differ it s not that often, but when they do I tend to agree with Thomas. Whack job? Well that s one word to use. I would personally go with batshit insane leaving no room for ambiguity.
shikha.dalmia@reason.org (Shikha Dalmia) is rather skeptical:
3.22.09 3.28.093.15.09 3.21.093.8.09 3.14.09
Aaron Wilson explains:
LiveNBreath Football says: May 28th, 2009 at 2:02 pm How could the court actually rule on this? Doesn t Delaware have a cases/controversies requirement? In other words, no advisory opinions. (report as inappropriate) Rating: Not yet rated
DougJ tells the real story:
4 June 24th, 2009 at 11:49 pm Ash Can Does Clarence Thomas ever actually, you know, say anything?
Roy Edroso has another idea:
Best Of Shops & Services Eats & Treats People & Places Essay Bars & Clubs Sex, Sports, and Recreation Arts & Entertainment Best of Ads Best of NYC Reader's Poll 2008
Sources:
Stogie Henry C. Jackson Paul Hogarth Aaron Wilson Ashby Jones Evan Harris azuakanwa MURPHY carie Chief Editor Steve Sailer Epaminondas Eugene Volokh DougJ shikha.dalmia@reason.org (Shikha Dalmia) Roy Edroso
Disclaimer:
This text is automatically generated from different sources on the internet. It must be considered an experiment
Always On Watch: Semper Vigilans Musical Interlude National Review Online Steyn: Behind the Times Moe Lane July 4, 2009.
Henry C. Jackson does a quick recap:
Minn. Supreme Court paves way for Democrat Al Franken to fill long-vacant Senate seat June 30th, 2009 Minn. court rules for Franken in Senate fightST. PAUL, Minn. â€" The Minnesota Supreme Court on Tuesday ordered that Democrat Al Franken be certified as the winner of the state's long-running Senate race.
In response, Paul Hogarth claims:
But Property Rights are Protected ... If there is one bright spot from today's Court decision, the 18,000 same-sex couples who wed before November 4th are still legally married - despite efforts by Kenneth Starr to convince the Court otherwise. California law presumes that ballot measures are not retroactive, without clear and unambiguous proof that it was the voters' intent. But the Court also pointed out that these couples had acquired "vested property rights as lawfully married spouses," and to suddenly take their licenses away would be a blatant violation of due process.
For this reason, Aaron Wilson says:
Permalink | Comments | Latest stories in: Latest News and Rumors , Top Stories Previous: Jimmy Smith Pleads Not Guilty Next: Panthers Owner Returns To Practice Months After Heart Transplant
Ashby Jones brings a word of caution:
« Previous Embattled Stanford Indicted, Surrenders Next » Pair Crows over Botched Chicken Giveaway, Sues KFC Law Blog HOME PAGE
Evan Harris also takes into account the following fact:
« Previous | Main | Next » The Nomination Battle ContinuesMay 30, 2009 8:37 PMWatch my report on where things stand with Sotomayor’s nomination process. Some of her critics have accused her of racism, but others, including some Republicans, say that goes too far. The votes seem to be adding up in the Senate â€" especially as some Republicans fear angering women and Hispanics.
Thinking that's not all, azuakanwa adds:
Moment to Moment My Layman s View Onochie Anibeze Owei Lakemfa People & Politics Point of Order Positive Letters
As MURPHY says:
#9 | Posted by MURPHY at 2009-05-24 10:33 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose) Funny Newsworthy Offensive Abusive huger??? Wtf is that? It's the comparative form of the adjective 'huge'. 'Hugest' (in case you ever run into that word) is the superlative form.
Similarly, carie adds:
Botched Diaz execution prompts further study by commission Botched Execution -- Botched Protocol? Botched Execution Demands State Scrutiny Of Lethal Injection
For example, Chief Editor considers:
18 . KA'DOYO... says: June 19, 2009 at 9:51 am I seriously think RB eminine pa kupesha abena Zambia. Just wait and see
As Steve Sailer says:
But Judge Sotomayor insisted that her test scores were sub-par â€" “though not so far off the mark that I wasn’t able to succeed at those institutions.†Her scores have not been made public.
Epaminondas might have an idea about it:
We Stand With The Iranian People The Infidel Bloggers Alliance Radio Show Gathering Storm Report Radio Show
Eugene Volokh considers that:
( link ) Uh_Clem ( mail ): Obviously the court is unaware of the "drugs exception" to the constitution. /sarcasm 6.18.2009 4:59pm
In response, DougJ claims:
3 June 24th, 2009 at 11:45 pm Comrade Stuck Robert Bork is really a bit of whack job. My general impression of them is quite good. The justice up there who I most admire is Clarence Thomas. I notice that when he and Scalia differ it s not that often, but when they do I tend to agree with Thomas. Whack job? Well that s one word to use. I would personally go with batshit insane leaving no room for ambiguity.
shikha.dalmia@reason.org (Shikha Dalmia) is rather skeptical:
3.22.09 3.28.093.15.09 3.21.093.8.09 3.14.09
Aaron Wilson explains:
LiveNBreath Football says: May 28th, 2009 at 2:02 pm How could the court actually rule on this? Doesn t Delaware have a cases/controversies requirement? In other words, no advisory opinions. (report as inappropriate) Rating: Not yet rated
DougJ tells the real story:
4 June 24th, 2009 at 11:49 pm Ash Can Does Clarence Thomas ever actually, you know, say anything?
Roy Edroso has another idea:
Best Of Shops & Services Eats & Treats People & Places Essay Bars & Clubs Sex, Sports, and Recreation Arts & Entertainment Best of Ads Best of NYC Reader's Poll 2008
Sources:
Stogie Henry C. Jackson Paul Hogarth Aaron Wilson Ashby Jones Evan Harris azuakanwa MURPHY carie Chief Editor Steve Sailer Epaminondas Eugene Volokh DougJ shikha.dalmia@reason.org (Shikha Dalmia) Roy Edroso
Disclaimer:
This text is automatically generated from different sources on the internet. It must be considered an experiment
Supreme Court From: Tom Hall David Stras Cory Doctorow Ken Lammers R Lee Wrights Wrightslaw Droot@reason.com (Damon W. Root) Howard Friedman Daniel Carlat, MD Banking LawProf Lyle Denniston David Bernstein Paul Edward Parker Esther Cepeda Philstar.com - Breaking News Aaron Wilson Donald E. Skinner The Blogprof /26709881
Tom Hall shows how it is done:
As an interesting aside, William Carney had been a vibrant, active father. The Court noted his IQ of 127. The injuries which led the trial Judge to rule that Mr. Carney couldn’t have custody of his children were sustained while he was serving in the military reserve.
For this purpose, David Stras suggests:
01/18/2009 - 01/25/200901/25/2009 - 02/01/200902/01/2009 - 02/08/2009
Cory Doctorow remembers that:
Take a look at this #21 posted by seanphurley , June 29, 2009 7:56 AM So it was a simple hostage-taking? It seems the man behind the overthrow was also trained at the school of americas... There's a great discussion on this going on over at economixt - http://www.economixt.com/2009/06/military-overthrows-honduras-president
While it may be true, Ken Lammers thinks:
The Supreme Court rejects this interpretation of the situation:Whatever the significance of Ferguson’s comments that broke the silence, they were the product of the coercive interrogation and environment created by police. Surely, police may not use the product of such techniques as proof of a voluntary reinitiation of communication and subsequent waiver of the right to counsel. . . . Under the totality of the circumstances, we hold that this encounter was one continuous custodial interrogation conducted in such a manner as to deliberately disregard a clear, unambiguous and unequivocal invocation of the right to counsel and coerce Ferguson to incriminate himself.
R Lee Wrights is absolutely sure that:
While liberal advocacy groups have long espoused a commitment to the First Amendment, they are now are pouncing on efforts to protect political free speech. On the Campaign Legal Center s blog, Tara Malloy and J. Gerald Hebert recently proclaimed the growing national movement to protect the voice of grassroots activists as something to be feared.
But Wrightslaw has a different opinion:
Search Wrightslaw web www.Wrightslaw.com Google Ads © 2008 The Wrightslaw Way Sitemap Cutline by Chris Pearson .
However, droot@reason.com (Damon W. Root) thinks differently:
9.23.07 9.30.079.16.07 9.23.079.9.07 9.16.07
For this purpose, Howard Friedman suggests:
Pacific Justice Institute PARL People For the American Way SALDEF Secular Coalition for America Sikh Coalition
Daniel Carlat, MD scans the other's answers and reply:
Thursday, July 2, 2009 Prescription Data-Mining is Getting Battered in Court Prescription data-mining is a marketing tool in which drug companies purchase information from pharmacies that allow them to spy on doctors' prescribing practices. The companies use this information in a variety of sneaky ways. Front line drug reps download this information to their laptops and use it to tailor their marketing pitches before they call on doctors. Higher level marketing executives use the data to craft targeted marketing campaigns involving everything from pseudo-journals to invitations to promotional dinner meetings.
Banking LawProf does not seem to agree with this. In his own words:
Name: Email Address: URL: Remember personal info? Comments: News Readers & Feeds FeedBurner Subscription Service Enter your Email Powered by FeedBlitz
Lyle Denniston intervenes and adds:
The Maloney  petition  and the appendix  (a lengthy file) are available for downloads. (It has not yet been assigned a docket number.) The already pending cases on the issue are National Rifle Association v. City of Chicago (08-1497) and McDoanld v. City of Chicago (08-1521).
David Bernstein sees it this way:
Matt Welch Room for Debate The Torch Virginia Postrel Wonkette Betsy's Page CalPundit Chequer-Board
Paul Edward Parker objects:
CORRECTION: The earlier version of this story incorrectly said the state Supreme Court indicated it was unlikely the issue of public access to juror questionnaires will arise again.
Furthermore, Esther Cepeda claims:
To these people I say: take a deep breath, trust the guy you take so much credit for getting elected in the first place, and may the best man or woman Supreme Court Justice candidate win.
philstar.com - Breaking News imagines that:
The capitol, through Gov. Enrique Garcia Jr. and Treasurer Emerlinda Talento, asked the High Court to reverse a ruling of the Court of Appeals that had spared PEZA of real property tax liability on lots covered by the Bataan Economic Zone.
However, Aaron Wilson states that:
Send Scoop Give Us Feedback PFT Mobile Login / Register Layout: Font Size: A A A 09 Delaware Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Sports Betting Lottery
Donald E. Skinner notices:
uuworld.org : unitarian universalists decry calif. gay marriage ruling About Us | Subscriptions | Advertising | Search Powered by Google
The blogprof has another idea:
June 21, 2009 8:54 PM The blogprof said... Don t know, and it really doesn t matter here. It s a common sense issue as I see it.
Sources:
Tom Hall David Stras Cory Doctorow Ken Lammers R Lee Wrights Wrightslaw droot@reason.com (Damon W. Root) Howard Friedman Daniel Carlat, MD Banking LawProf Lyle Denniston David Bernstein Paul Edward Parker Esther Cepeda philstar.com - Breaking News Aaron Wilson Donald E. Skinner The blogprof
Disclaimer:
This text is automatically generated from different sources on the internet. It must be considered an experiment
As an interesting aside, William Carney had been a vibrant, active father. The Court noted his IQ of 127. The injuries which led the trial Judge to rule that Mr. Carney couldn’t have custody of his children were sustained while he was serving in the military reserve.
For this purpose, David Stras suggests:
01/18/2009 - 01/25/200901/25/2009 - 02/01/200902/01/2009 - 02/08/2009
Cory Doctorow remembers that:
Take a look at this #21 posted by seanphurley , June 29, 2009 7:56 AM So it was a simple hostage-taking? It seems the man behind the overthrow was also trained at the school of americas... There's a great discussion on this going on over at economixt - http://www.economixt.com/2009/06/military-overthrows-honduras-president
While it may be true, Ken Lammers thinks:
The Supreme Court rejects this interpretation of the situation:Whatever the significance of Ferguson’s comments that broke the silence, they were the product of the coercive interrogation and environment created by police. Surely, police may not use the product of such techniques as proof of a voluntary reinitiation of communication and subsequent waiver of the right to counsel. . . . Under the totality of the circumstances, we hold that this encounter was one continuous custodial interrogation conducted in such a manner as to deliberately disregard a clear, unambiguous and unequivocal invocation of the right to counsel and coerce Ferguson to incriminate himself.
R Lee Wrights is absolutely sure that:
While liberal advocacy groups have long espoused a commitment to the First Amendment, they are now are pouncing on efforts to protect political free speech. On the Campaign Legal Center s blog, Tara Malloy and J. Gerald Hebert recently proclaimed the growing national movement to protect the voice of grassroots activists as something to be feared.
But Wrightslaw has a different opinion:
Search Wrightslaw web www.Wrightslaw.com Google Ads © 2008 The Wrightslaw Way Sitemap Cutline by Chris Pearson .
However, droot@reason.com (Damon W. Root) thinks differently:
9.23.07 9.30.079.16.07 9.23.079.9.07 9.16.07
For this purpose, Howard Friedman suggests:
Pacific Justice Institute PARL People For the American Way SALDEF Secular Coalition for America Sikh Coalition
Daniel Carlat, MD scans the other's answers and reply:
Thursday, July 2, 2009 Prescription Data-Mining is Getting Battered in Court Prescription data-mining is a marketing tool in which drug companies purchase information from pharmacies that allow them to spy on doctors' prescribing practices. The companies use this information in a variety of sneaky ways. Front line drug reps download this information to their laptops and use it to tailor their marketing pitches before they call on doctors. Higher level marketing executives use the data to craft targeted marketing campaigns involving everything from pseudo-journals to invitations to promotional dinner meetings.
Banking LawProf does not seem to agree with this. In his own words:
Name: Email Address: URL: Remember personal info? Comments: News Readers & Feeds FeedBurner Subscription Service Enter your Email Powered by FeedBlitz
Lyle Denniston intervenes and adds:
The Maloney  petition  and the appendix  (a lengthy file) are available for downloads. (It has not yet been assigned a docket number.) The already pending cases on the issue are National Rifle Association v. City of Chicago (08-1497) and McDoanld v. City of Chicago (08-1521).
David Bernstein sees it this way:
Matt Welch Room for Debate The Torch Virginia Postrel Wonkette Betsy's Page CalPundit Chequer-Board
Paul Edward Parker objects:
CORRECTION: The earlier version of this story incorrectly said the state Supreme Court indicated it was unlikely the issue of public access to juror questionnaires will arise again.
Furthermore, Esther Cepeda claims:
To these people I say: take a deep breath, trust the guy you take so much credit for getting elected in the first place, and may the best man or woman Supreme Court Justice candidate win.
philstar.com - Breaking News imagines that:
The capitol, through Gov. Enrique Garcia Jr. and Treasurer Emerlinda Talento, asked the High Court to reverse a ruling of the Court of Appeals that had spared PEZA of real property tax liability on lots covered by the Bataan Economic Zone.
However, Aaron Wilson states that:
Send Scoop Give Us Feedback PFT Mobile Login / Register Layout: Font Size: A A A 09 Delaware Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Sports Betting Lottery
Donald E. Skinner notices:
uuworld.org : unitarian universalists decry calif. gay marriage ruling About Us | Subscriptions | Advertising | Search Powered by Google
The blogprof has another idea:
June 21, 2009 8:54 PM The blogprof said... Don t know, and it really doesn t matter here. It s a common sense issue as I see it.
Sources:
Tom Hall David Stras Cory Doctorow Ken Lammers R Lee Wrights Wrightslaw droot@reason.com (Damon W. Root) Howard Friedman Daniel Carlat, MD Banking LawProf Lyle Denniston David Bernstein Paul Edward Parker Esther Cepeda philstar.com - Breaking News Aaron Wilson Donald E. Skinner The blogprof
Disclaimer:
This text is automatically generated from different sources on the internet. It must be considered an experiment
Supreme Court From: Droot@reason.com (Damon W. Root) Lyle Denniston Wayne Thibodeau Eric Kleefeld Pat Dollard Bureau News Shikha.dalmia@reason.org (Shikha Dalmia) Joan Garry Ken Lammers TresSugar Ed Brayton Jeremy Duda Editor@truthdig.com Chief Editor Letterseditor Lyle Denniston Jim Burroway Xoff /26709882
But droot@reason.com (Damon W. Root) has a different opinion:
5.28.06 6.4.065.21.06 5.28.065.14.06 5.21.06
For this purpose, Lyle Denniston suggests:
The two opposing sides filed their briefs on that question last Monday, and on Thursday, the NRA sought to join in as an amicus . (The briefs can be downloaded from the Ninth Circuit s website for those with a PACER account, under docket 07-15763, entries 88, 90 and 93.) If that Court votes to leave the panel ruling intact, the next step for this case would be the Supreme Court, since an appeal is likely, either way.
Wayne Thibodeau brings some great news:
Today, MacTavish will get to tell that story in front of Supreme Court Justice Gordon Campbell. He ll be appearing before Campbell for what the court describes as a quick ruling, one that should determine the financial settlement owed to the 43-year-old Montague man.
But Eric Kleefeld has a different opinion:
So I don't see any legal grounds whatsoever that Pawlenty can rely on to refuse to certify the election. But I don't know if this is a novel area of law for MN. Has this issue never been dealt with in MN? If ti has not, does that give a green light to Pawlenty to "make up the law as he goes along?" If that's true then it's too bad for Franken that Pawlenty can say "Oh, since there is a federal appeal I won't certify Franken."
Pat Dollard is absolutely sure that:
But he said he is not worried, noting that Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito too “approximately 70 days to get confirmed from the time that they were announced.â€
Bureau News is not really sure about that:
NJ father says he's not giving up on getting custody of son in Brazil, despite legal setback June 3rd, 2009 NJ dad in Brazil: Not giving up on son's custodyNEWARK, N.J. â€" A New Jersey father who headed to Brazil to take custody of his son says he's frustrated by a judge's decision but will never give up fighting for his child.
shikha.dalmia@reason.org (Shikha Dalmia) might have an idea about it:
1.18.04 1.24.041.11.04 1.17.041.4.04 1.10.04
In other words, Joan Garry puts it this way:
- + rmax53 I'm a Fan of rmax53 I'm a fan of this user permalink For gay couples, the lack of BENEFITS awarded through MARRIAGE is the civil rights issue at hand. As a gay man, I welcome the federal case. How many years will it take for all 50 states to recognize gay marriage if it's done one by one? I think a federal case has an excellent chance of winning, on the legal merits of equal protection and treatment under the law. There's no bending or creation of law, just equal application of current law. Even Scalia will be able to see that ( http://www.boston.com/news/specials/gay_marriage/articles/2004/05/16/the_same_sex_marriage_argument_that_justice_scalia_fears/ )
Ken Lammers tells the real story:
Smith v. Illinois this matter is reversed.In the second case, Commonwealth v. Ferguson (No. 081645), the defendant was more savvy and put his assertion of the right to counsel a little more clearly: "Nah, I want a lawyer, you know what I’m saying?"
TresSugar has another idea:
Gillespie isn't saying that a Latina woman can't judge a case involving Latina's and Asian-Americans; he's trying to explain why people might be concerned about her statement that she could conceivably arrive at a different conclusion than a white male justice because of her background. Now, I think she dials that back enough that I don't think it should stand in the way of her appointment, but it is completely fair to question her about it.
As a result of that, Ed Brayton belives:
Print Subscribe to RSS
Jeremy Duda tells the real story:
Less than six hours after hearing oral arguments, the court on June 23 accepted jurisdiction and ruled that the Legislature did not send its budget bills to the governor as mandated by the state Constitution. However, the court also ruled that due to unique circumstances, it will not order lawmakers to immediately transmit the bills to Brewer, as the governor had requested in her lawsuit.
Furthermore, editor@truthdig.com claims:
Right now . again, RIGHT NOW it is my position that attacking Pres. Obama will ruin any opportunity for pulling out of this crisies or regaining control of our government. You think Pres. Obama is one of them, but you use only half of the facts .. that s questionable.
Chief Editor can't forget that:
28 . Mbo Sam says: June 19, 2009 at 11:30 am Harmonise! Harmonise! Harmonise! HEAR!! HEAR!! HEAR!!
However, letterseditor states that:
What the West has forgotten is that rightly constituted public authority (i.e., presumptively, a legitimately constituted government) is under a strict moral obligation to defend the security and basic human rights of those for whom it has assumed responsibility. If a government fails to live up to that obligation and acts, or threatens to act, to deprive its citizens of such rights, then that government has forfeited its right to govern. There is a moral right to displace such governments and their leaders using no more force than reasonably necessary.
In other words, Lyle Denniston puts it this way:
Links Supreme Court S. Ct. docket S. Ct. transcripts Solicitor General How Appealing Volokh Conspiracy Balkinization ABA Merits Briefs AP - Released Opinions Medill Case Summaries Oyez Oral Arguments Findlaw S. Ct. Findlaw S. Ct. opinions Cornell S. Ct. First Amendment Center Justice Talking Jurist Paperchase
While it may be true, Jim Burroway thinks:
Tony Perkins Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family Research Council.
While it may be true, xoff thinks:
Arizona California Colorado Connecticut DailyKos Firedoglake Florida Georgia Illinois Indiana Iowa Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Missouri Montana MyDD New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York New York North Carolina Ohio Ohio Oklahoma Pennsylvania Rhode Island Swing State Project Texas Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin
Sources:
droot@reason.com (Damon W. Root) Lyle Denniston Wayne Thibodeau Eric Kleefeld Pat Dollard Bureau News shikha.dalmia@reason.org (Shikha Dalmia) Joan Garry Ken Lammers TresSugar Ed Brayton Jeremy Duda editor@truthdig.com Chief Editor letterseditor Lyle Denniston Jim Burroway xoff
Disclaimer:
This text is automatically generated from different sources on the internet. It must be considered an experiment
5.28.06 6.4.065.21.06 5.28.065.14.06 5.21.06
For this purpose, Lyle Denniston suggests:
The two opposing sides filed their briefs on that question last Monday, and on Thursday, the NRA sought to join in as an amicus . (The briefs can be downloaded from the Ninth Circuit s website for those with a PACER account, under docket 07-15763, entries 88, 90 and 93.) If that Court votes to leave the panel ruling intact, the next step for this case would be the Supreme Court, since an appeal is likely, either way.
Wayne Thibodeau brings some great news:
Today, MacTavish will get to tell that story in front of Supreme Court Justice Gordon Campbell. He ll be appearing before Campbell for what the court describes as a quick ruling, one that should determine the financial settlement owed to the 43-year-old Montague man.
But Eric Kleefeld has a different opinion:
So I don't see any legal grounds whatsoever that Pawlenty can rely on to refuse to certify the election. But I don't know if this is a novel area of law for MN. Has this issue never been dealt with in MN? If ti has not, does that give a green light to Pawlenty to "make up the law as he goes along?" If that's true then it's too bad for Franken that Pawlenty can say "Oh, since there is a federal appeal I won't certify Franken."
Pat Dollard is absolutely sure that:
But he said he is not worried, noting that Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito too “approximately 70 days to get confirmed from the time that they were announced.â€
Bureau News is not really sure about that:
NJ father says he's not giving up on getting custody of son in Brazil, despite legal setback June 3rd, 2009 NJ dad in Brazil: Not giving up on son's custodyNEWARK, N.J. â€" A New Jersey father who headed to Brazil to take custody of his son says he's frustrated by a judge's decision but will never give up fighting for his child.
shikha.dalmia@reason.org (Shikha Dalmia) might have an idea about it:
1.18.04 1.24.041.11.04 1.17.041.4.04 1.10.04
In other words, Joan Garry puts it this way:
- + rmax53 I'm a Fan of rmax53 I'm a fan of this user permalink For gay couples, the lack of BENEFITS awarded through MARRIAGE is the civil rights issue at hand. As a gay man, I welcome the federal case. How many years will it take for all 50 states to recognize gay marriage if it's done one by one? I think a federal case has an excellent chance of winning, on the legal merits of equal protection and treatment under the law. There's no bending or creation of law, just equal application of current law. Even Scalia will be able to see that ( http://www.boston.com/news/specials/gay_marriage/articles/2004/05/16/the_same_sex_marriage_argument_that_justice_scalia_fears/ )
Ken Lammers tells the real story:
Smith v. Illinois this matter is reversed.In the second case, Commonwealth v. Ferguson (No. 081645), the defendant was more savvy and put his assertion of the right to counsel a little more clearly: "Nah, I want a lawyer, you know what I’m saying?"
TresSugar has another idea:
Gillespie isn't saying that a Latina woman can't judge a case involving Latina's and Asian-Americans; he's trying to explain why people might be concerned about her statement that she could conceivably arrive at a different conclusion than a white male justice because of her background. Now, I think she dials that back enough that I don't think it should stand in the way of her appointment, but it is completely fair to question her about it.
As a result of that, Ed Brayton belives:
Print Subscribe to RSS
Jeremy Duda tells the real story:
Less than six hours after hearing oral arguments, the court on June 23 accepted jurisdiction and ruled that the Legislature did not send its budget bills to the governor as mandated by the state Constitution. However, the court also ruled that due to unique circumstances, it will not order lawmakers to immediately transmit the bills to Brewer, as the governor had requested in her lawsuit.
Furthermore, editor@truthdig.com claims:
Right now . again, RIGHT NOW it is my position that attacking Pres. Obama will ruin any opportunity for pulling out of this crisies or regaining control of our government. You think Pres. Obama is one of them, but you use only half of the facts .. that s questionable.
Chief Editor can't forget that:
28 . Mbo Sam says: June 19, 2009 at 11:30 am Harmonise! Harmonise! Harmonise! HEAR!! HEAR!! HEAR!!
However, letterseditor states that:
What the West has forgotten is that rightly constituted public authority (i.e., presumptively, a legitimately constituted government) is under a strict moral obligation to defend the security and basic human rights of those for whom it has assumed responsibility. If a government fails to live up to that obligation and acts, or threatens to act, to deprive its citizens of such rights, then that government has forfeited its right to govern. There is a moral right to displace such governments and their leaders using no more force than reasonably necessary.
In other words, Lyle Denniston puts it this way:
Links Supreme Court S. Ct. docket S. Ct. transcripts Solicitor General How Appealing Volokh Conspiracy Balkinization ABA Merits Briefs AP - Released Opinions Medill Case Summaries Oyez Oral Arguments Findlaw S. Ct. Findlaw S. Ct. opinions Cornell S. Ct. First Amendment Center Justice Talking Jurist Paperchase
While it may be true, Jim Burroway thinks:
Tony Perkins Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family Research Council.
While it may be true, xoff thinks:
Arizona California Colorado Connecticut DailyKos Firedoglake Florida Georgia Illinois Indiana Iowa Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Missouri Montana MyDD New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York New York North Carolina Ohio Ohio Oklahoma Pennsylvania Rhode Island Swing State Project Texas Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin
Sources:
droot@reason.com (Damon W. Root) Lyle Denniston Wayne Thibodeau Eric Kleefeld Pat Dollard Bureau News shikha.dalmia@reason.org (Shikha Dalmia) Joan Garry Ken Lammers TresSugar Ed Brayton Jeremy Duda editor@truthdig.com Chief Editor letterseditor Lyle Denniston Jim Burroway xoff
Disclaimer:
This text is automatically generated from different sources on the internet. It must be considered an experiment
Supreme Court From: DougJ Joseph The Huffington Post News Editors Lyle Denniston The GTL™ Steve Sailer Brian Beutler Greg Ashby Jones Orin Kerr Kimberly A. Kralowec Dday Leslie Paul Hogarth Gateway Pundit Eugene Volokh /26709879
DougJ intervenes and adds:
20 June 25th, 2009 at 1:05 am r€nato Bork thinks this is a liberal, left-leaning Supreme Court and proceeds to praise four of the five justices (Alito, Thomas, Scalia and Roberts) who form the right-wing majority on the court. I guess Bork would not be happy until all nine seats were filled by far-right wackjobs.
Despite the previous arguments, joseph has many reasons to think otherwise:
Welcome to the CleanTechies Blog! If you are new here, you might want to subscribe to the RSS feed or via email for updates on this topic.
The Huffington Post News Editors brings some great news:
Read More: Bill Kristol , Bill Kristol Jennifer Granholm , Bill Kristol Prediction Wrong , Bill Kristol Sonia Sotomayor , Bill Kristol Supreme Court , Bill Kristol Video , Politics News
Lyle Denniston does a quick recap:
January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006
Before going any further, The GTL™ wants to get this straight:
decided (The New York Times). The highest scoring minority firefighters, passed over, took exception and took New Haven to court over it while President Barack Hussein Obama s top (so-called) liberal SCOTUS nominee, the latina justice Sonia Sotomayor ruled in favor of the township and against the discriminated, citing precedent in her opinion, as she should have. The discriminated victims disagreed and took their fight to the Supreme Court of The United States in desparation. The SCOTUS found in favor of the discriminated men, thus overturning Sotomayor s decision. Strangely, the majority who ruled in favor of the discriminated minority of firemen were the (so-called) conservative justices while the dissenting justices who ruled against them were the so-called liberal justices. Every bit as stunning as the reversal of ideological makeup of the Kelo Decision s majority.
Steve Sailer intervenes and adds:
In the program, Judge Sotomayor also rejected the proposition that minorities must become advocates of “selection by merit alone.†She said diversity improved the legal system â€" like having a Hispanic judge in a case where a litigant and his family is Hispanic, and who can translate what is happening into Spanish.
Brian Beutler might have an idea about it:
----- It seems to me that Alito pulled the willing wool over Conrad's eyes with respect to points 4, 5, and 6. Since by his own account, as of January 2006, Conrad had supported 217 of Bush's judicial nominations, I hope/trust that Conrad will do what he can to push forward the nominations of a Democratic president.
Thinking that's not all, Greg adds:
So, the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act does not permit "mixed motive" jury instructions. That is because the plaintiff's burden of proof is to always show that age was THE cause of a challenged adverse action. Unlike Title VII and California's FEHA, the ADEA does not permit the plaintiff to merely prove that a discriminatory motive was just one of many. Big case under the ADEA, but it will have no real effect on California age discrimination litigation under FEHA.
DougJ might have an idea about it:
What Obama actually said :Now, the process of selecting someone to replace Justice Souter is among my most serious responsibilities as President. So I will seek somebody with a sharp and independent mind and a record of excellence and integrity. I will seek someone who understands that justice isn t about some abstract legal theory or footnote in a case book; it is also about how our laws affect the daily realities of people s lives whether they can make a living and care for their families; whether they feel safe in their homes and welcome in their own nation.
Ashby Jones is not really sure about that:
10:15 am June 25, 2009 To Melvin wrote: The Constitution allows for amendments and provides a specific process to do so. Amendments are the only valid way the Constitution can be changed not through renegade judges. Thus, what is your point?
Orin Kerr objects:
And remember, it's a big Internet. If you think we were mistaken in removing your post (or, in extreme cases, in removing you) -- or if you prefer a more free-for-all approach -- there are surely plenty of ways you can still get your views out.
Kimberly A. Kralowec is absolutely sure that:
Categories Appellate practice Attorneys’ fees (CCP §1021.5) Class Action "Fairness" Act Class actions - arbitration
dday says it all comes down to this:
Parties/Protests Planned: The California Supreme Court to Deliver Its Prop. 8 Verdict on Tuesday Posted by dday, Hullabaloo at 8:10 AM on May 23, 2009.
Leslie scans the other's answers and reply:
Marcelo and Carolyn Ferrari contend the law doesn’t preclude their suit against Wyeth and GlaxoSmithKline over the hepatitis B, Hib and DTaP vaccines received by their son Stefan in 1998.
However, Paul Hogarth thinks differently:
Ignore the churches. They can't and won't be swayed to join our cause, except for those who are already on our side. We must protest the people who have the real power and tell them that our votes are just as important as their wallets and their careers.
Gateway Pundit scans the other's answers and reply:
Mehr News Tehran Times Islamic Republic News Fars News (Iran) Afgha-nistan Hindustan Times Tribune India
Eugene Volokh remembers that:
Although I'm sure David would feel differently about the case had it involved hyenas. Second, to Houston Lawyer, yes, public employees have rights that private employees don't, on the theory that government employment is state action so some degree of constitutional protections apply in public employment. That approach goes back to the 1960s. So, there are a mess o' "balancing tests" regarding the constitutional rights of public employees in their employment. For drug testing, see the Supreme Court's decision in
Sources:
DougJ joseph The Huffington Post News Editors Lyle Denniston The GTL™ Steve Sailer Brian Beutler Greg Ashby Jones Orin Kerr Kimberly A. Kralowec dday Leslie Paul Hogarth Gateway Pundit Eugene Volokh
Disclaimer:
This text is automatically generated from different sources on the internet. It must be considered an experiment
20 June 25th, 2009 at 1:05 am r€nato Bork thinks this is a liberal, left-leaning Supreme Court and proceeds to praise four of the five justices (Alito, Thomas, Scalia and Roberts) who form the right-wing majority on the court. I guess Bork would not be happy until all nine seats were filled by far-right wackjobs.
Despite the previous arguments, joseph has many reasons to think otherwise:
Welcome to the CleanTechies Blog! If you are new here, you might want to subscribe to the RSS feed or via email for updates on this topic.
The Huffington Post News Editors brings some great news:
Read More: Bill Kristol , Bill Kristol Jennifer Granholm , Bill Kristol Prediction Wrong , Bill Kristol Sonia Sotomayor , Bill Kristol Supreme Court , Bill Kristol Video , Politics News
Lyle Denniston does a quick recap:
January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006
Before going any further, The GTL™ wants to get this straight:
decided (The New York Times). The highest scoring minority firefighters, passed over, took exception and took New Haven to court over it while President Barack Hussein Obama s top (so-called) liberal SCOTUS nominee, the latina justice Sonia Sotomayor ruled in favor of the township and against the discriminated, citing precedent in her opinion, as she should have. The discriminated victims disagreed and took their fight to the Supreme Court of The United States in desparation. The SCOTUS found in favor of the discriminated men, thus overturning Sotomayor s decision. Strangely, the majority who ruled in favor of the discriminated minority of firemen were the (so-called) conservative justices while the dissenting justices who ruled against them were the so-called liberal justices. Every bit as stunning as the reversal of ideological makeup of the Kelo Decision s majority.
Steve Sailer intervenes and adds:
In the program, Judge Sotomayor also rejected the proposition that minorities must become advocates of “selection by merit alone.†She said diversity improved the legal system â€" like having a Hispanic judge in a case where a litigant and his family is Hispanic, and who can translate what is happening into Spanish.
Brian Beutler might have an idea about it:
----- It seems to me that Alito pulled the willing wool over Conrad's eyes with respect to points 4, 5, and 6. Since by his own account, as of January 2006, Conrad had supported 217 of Bush's judicial nominations, I hope/trust that Conrad will do what he can to push forward the nominations of a Democratic president.
Thinking that's not all, Greg adds:
So, the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act does not permit "mixed motive" jury instructions. That is because the plaintiff's burden of proof is to always show that age was THE cause of a challenged adverse action. Unlike Title VII and California's FEHA, the ADEA does not permit the plaintiff to merely prove that a discriminatory motive was just one of many. Big case under the ADEA, but it will have no real effect on California age discrimination litigation under FEHA.
DougJ might have an idea about it:
What Obama actually said :Now, the process of selecting someone to replace Justice Souter is among my most serious responsibilities as President. So I will seek somebody with a sharp and independent mind and a record of excellence and integrity. I will seek someone who understands that justice isn t about some abstract legal theory or footnote in a case book; it is also about how our laws affect the daily realities of people s lives whether they can make a living and care for their families; whether they feel safe in their homes and welcome in their own nation.
Ashby Jones is not really sure about that:
10:15 am June 25, 2009 To Melvin wrote: The Constitution allows for amendments and provides a specific process to do so. Amendments are the only valid way the Constitution can be changed not through renegade judges. Thus, what is your point?
Orin Kerr objects:
And remember, it's a big Internet. If you think we were mistaken in removing your post (or, in extreme cases, in removing you) -- or if you prefer a more free-for-all approach -- there are surely plenty of ways you can still get your views out.
Kimberly A. Kralowec is absolutely sure that:
Categories Appellate practice Attorneys’ fees (CCP §1021.5) Class Action "Fairness" Act Class actions - arbitration
dday says it all comes down to this:
Parties/Protests Planned: The California Supreme Court to Deliver Its Prop. 8 Verdict on Tuesday Posted by dday, Hullabaloo at 8:10 AM on May 23, 2009.
Leslie scans the other's answers and reply:
Marcelo and Carolyn Ferrari contend the law doesn’t preclude their suit against Wyeth and GlaxoSmithKline over the hepatitis B, Hib and DTaP vaccines received by their son Stefan in 1998.
However, Paul Hogarth thinks differently:
Ignore the churches. They can't and won't be swayed to join our cause, except for those who are already on our side. We must protest the people who have the real power and tell them that our votes are just as important as their wallets and their careers.
Gateway Pundit scans the other's answers and reply:
Mehr News Tehran Times Islamic Republic News Fars News (Iran) Afgha-nistan Hindustan Times Tribune India
Eugene Volokh remembers that:
Although I'm sure David would feel differently about the case had it involved hyenas. Second, to Houston Lawyer, yes, public employees have rights that private employees don't, on the theory that government employment is state action so some degree of constitutional protections apply in public employment. That approach goes back to the 1960s. So, there are a mess o' "balancing tests" regarding the constitutional rights of public employees in their employment. For drug testing, see the Supreme Court's decision in
Sources:
DougJ joseph The Huffington Post News Editors Lyle Denniston The GTL™ Steve Sailer Brian Beutler Greg Ashby Jones Orin Kerr Kimberly A. Kralowec dday Leslie Paul Hogarth Gateway Pundit Eugene Volokh
Disclaimer:
This text is automatically generated from different sources on the internet. It must be considered an experiment
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
